The Future Power Grid
A technical answer to a political problem

The grid is the constraint. Risk is the key to unlocking it.

The IEA finds that 1,200–1,600 GW of grid capacity could be unlocked worldwide on infrastructure that already exists — no new lines required. The barrier is not steel and copper. It is a decision framework. We make the case for operating the grid by quantified risk instead of a 1950s pass/fail heuristic.

● LIVE  EENS — system risk (MWh/h) Møre region, Norway · 5–6 Dec 2014
0.0258 baseline FAULT 19:32

19 hours of steadily rising risk, fully visible — then a blackout that left 150,000 people without power. The signal was there. The decision framework was not.

01

The grid became the bottleneck of the energy transition.

Generation is being built faster than the network can absorb it. New lines take a decade. The queue cannot wait that long — and most of the answer is already in the ground.

2,500 GW
In connection queues globally
+50%
Grid investment needed to keep pace
1,200–1,600 GW
Unlockable on existing infrastructure
€43.5B
Annual European system value at stake

For seventy years, grids have been operated to a single rule: N-1 — survive the loss of any one component. It was a sound heuristic for the 1950s, built for a system with limited computing power, predictable load, and dispatchable generation.

That world is gone. Weather-driven renewables, ageing assets, and sudden new loads from electrification and data centres have made the grid a system of probabilities, not certainties. A binary pass/fail test cannot see the difference between a margin that is genuinely needed and one that is simply being held in reserve out of habit.

The result: networks run conservatively far below their real capability, while billions in renewable capacity wait in the queue for lines that may never need to be built.

No single technology can relieve system-wide congestion — the gains of grid-enhancing technologies are only realised alongside calculated, risk-based approaches to operation, backed by robust forecasting. — IEA, Electricity 2026, p.67 (paraphrased)

Two independent, authoritative conclusions point the same way: the missing piece is not more hardware. It is a way to measure and act on risk in real time.

02

It's happening on our watch.

A practical framework for operating the grid by quantified risk, in the right order. Three layers — and the first one makes the other two possible.

Capacity is not unlocked by stacking gadgets. It is unlocked by knowing, at every moment, how much risk you are actually carrying — and operating accordingly.

LAYER 01 · DECISION

Technical Rigour

Probabilistic Risk Assessment and Dynamic Security Assessment as the foundation. Measure expected unserved energy across every credible state, in real time. Without this layer, the gains below cannot be realised safely.

LAYER 02 · PHYSICAL

Implementation

Grid-enhancing technologies — dynamic line rating, topology optimisation, advanced power-flow control — deployed and risk-gated. Physical headroom, governed by the risk layer rather than static assumptions.

LAYER 03 · POLICY

Policy & Flexibility

Conditional connection and demand-side flexibility as operating principles. Large flexible loads connect under interruptible terms — turning consumers into security assets and aligning regulation with reality.

03

How we got here.

From a global research finding, to a published framework, to the work in progress now — and the people behind it.

2026 · The Finding

The IEA names the gap

Electricity 2026 quantifies it: more than a thousand gigawatts could be unlocked on existing infrastructure — but only by combining grid-enhancing technologies with calculated, risk-based operation. The hardware exists. The decision framework is missing.

White Paper 1 · Published

Unlocking grid capacity through risk-based operation

We set out the three-layer framework — PRA, DSA, and grid-enhancing technologies, deployed in the right order — and show why technology potential rarely becomes system reality without a common risk baseline.

White Paper 2 · In progress

From N-1 to Virtual N-1

We take the next step: dismantling N-1 as a safety target and introducing conditional connection — Virtual N-1 — for an estimated further 10–20% of utilisable capacity. Combined, the full framework points to a 20–45% increase.

The proof point · Dec 2014

Why this is not theoretical

The Møre blackout in western Norway showed the risk signal climbing for 19 hours before the fault. With a probabilistic framework in the control room, the trajectory would have triggered reserve alerts and preventive switching long before the cascade. The cost was real. So was the warning.

04

Publications.

A series building the technical and policy case, piece by piece. Open access.

05

Recognised by Europe's grid community.

The approach behind this work was named the 2025 Prize for Technological Innovation.

RGI Grid Awards 2025 · PCI Energy Days, Brussels

Prize for Technological Innovation

Renewables Grid Initiative

Exactly what Europe's power system needs today — a transparent tool for real-time prediction of grid risk, safely unlocking at least 25% more capacity and accelerating the transition without costly new infrastructure.

Presented by Anna Stürkgh (EU Commissioner) · Lars Aagaard (Danish Minister for Climate, Energy & Utilities)
Paraphrased from the jury citation.
Read the citation ↗
25%+
Additional capacity unlocked safely
12–48h
Risk prediction ahead of the fault
Europe-wide
Transferable across power systems
06

The authors.

Three independent voices in power-system reliability and risk.

A · S

Arne Brufladt Svendsen

Power-system reliability pioneer; developer of real-time probabilistic risk methodology for complex grids.

LinkedIn ↗
R · N

Robert Nyiredy

Commercial and industry lead in power-system reliability and security of supply.

LinkedIn ↗
M · M

Mathieu Milenkovic

Physicist working at the intersection of power systems, probabilistic risk, and grid analytics.

LinkedIn ↗